Global Competitiveness Report

1

The Global Competitiveness Report (GCR) was a yearly report published by the World Economic Forum. Between 2004 and 2020, the Global Competitiveness Report ranked countries based on the Global Competitiveness Index, developed by Xavier Sala-i-Martin and Elsa V. Artadi. Before that, the macroeconomic ranks were based on Jeffrey Sachs's Growth Development Index and the microeconomic ranks were based on Michael Porter's Business Competitiveness Index. The Global Competitiveness Index integrates the macroeconomic and the micro/business aspects of competitiveness into a single index. The report "assesses the ability of countries to provide high levels of prosperity to their citizens". This in turn depends on how productively a country uses available resources. Therefore, the Global Competitiveness Index measures the set of institutions, policies, and factors that set the sustainable current and medium-term levels of economic prosperity."

Description

Since 2004, the report ranks the world's nations according to the Global Competitiveness Index, based on the latest theoretical and empirical research. It is made up of over 110 variables, of which two thirds come from the Executive Opinion Survey, and one third comes from publicly available sources such as the United Nations. The variables are organized into twelve pillars, with each pillar representing an area considered as an important determinant of competitiveness. One part of the report is the Executive Opinion Survey, which is a survey of a representative sample of business leaders in their respective countries. Respondent numbers have increased every year and is currently just over 13,500 in 142 countries (2010). The report notes that as a nation develops, wages tend to increase, and that in order to sustain this higher income, labor productivity must improve for the nation to be competitive. In addition, what creates productivity in Sweden is necessarily different from what drives it in Ghana. Thus, the GCI separates countries into three specific stages: factor-driven, efficiency-driven, and innovation-driven, each implying a growing degree of complexity in the operation of the economy. The report has twelve pillars of competitiveness. These are: In the factor-driven stage countries compete based on their factor endowments, primarily unskilled labor and natural resources. Companies compete on the basis of prices and sell basic products or commodities, with their low productivity reflected in low wages. To maintain competitiveness at this stage of development, competitiveness hinges mainly on well-functioning public and private institutions (pillar 1), appropriate infrastructure (pillar 2), a stable macroeconomic framework (pillar 3), and good health and primary education (pillar 4). As wages rise with advancing development, countries move into the efficiency-driven stage of development, when they must begin to develop more efficient production processes and increase product quality. At this point, competitiveness becomes increasingly driven by higher education and training (pillar 5), efficient goods markets (pillar 6), efficient labor markets (pillar 7), developed financial markets (pillar 8), the ability to harness the benefits of existing technologies (pillar 9), and its market size, both domestic and international (pillar 10). Finally, as countries move into the innovation-driven stage, they are only able to sustain higher wages and a higher standard of living if their businesses are able to compete by providing new or unique products. At this stage, companies must compete by producing new and different goods using the most sophisticated production processes (pillar 11) and through innovation (pillar 12). Thus, the impact of each pillar on competitiveness varies across countries, in function of their stages of economic development. Therefore, in the calculation of the GCI, pillars are given different weights depending on the per capita income of the nation. The weights used are the values that best explain growth in recent years For example, the sophistication and innovation factors contribute 10% to the final score in factor and efficiency-driven economies, but 30% in innovation-driven economies. Intermediate values are used for economies in transition between stages. The Global Competitiveness Index's annual reports are somewhat similar to the Ease of Doing Business Index and the Indices of Economic Freedom, which also look at factors affecting economic growth (but not as many as the Global Competitiveness Report). Data from the Global Competitiveness Index relating to the strength of auditing and reporting standards, institutions and judicial independence is used in the Basel AML Index, a money laundering risk assessment tool developed by the Basel Institute on Governance.

Limitations

In spite of the World Economic Forum's Global Risks Report which is increasingly identifying environmental pressures as the dominant risks to humanity, none of the indicators used to determine this report's competitiveness ranking reflect any of the countries' environmental dimensions such as energy, water, climate risks, resource or food security, etc. The Global Competitiveness Report 2018 and 2019 used the ecological footprint as a context indicator, but the footprint was not included in the scoring algorithm that determines the ranking.

2019 rankings

This is the full ranking of the 2019 report:

2018 rankings

This is the top 30 of the 2018 report: โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ United States 85.6 (+1) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฌ Singapore 83.5 (+1) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Germany 82.8 (+2) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ญ Switzerland 82.6 (โˆ’3) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ต Japan 82.5 (+4) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Netherlands 82.4 (โˆ’2) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Hong Kong 82.3 (โˆ’1) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง United Kingdom 82 (โ€”) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ช Sweden 81.7 (โˆ’2) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Denmark 80.6 (+2) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ฎ Finland 80.3 (โˆ’1) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Canada 79.9 (+2) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ผ Taiwan 79.3 (+2) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ Australia 78.9 (+7) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ท South Korea 78.8 (+11) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ด Norway 78.2 (โˆ’5) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท France 78 (+5) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฟ New Zealand 77.5 (โˆ’5) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡บ Luxembourg 76.6 (โ€”) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Israel 76.6 (โˆ’4) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ช Belgium 76.6 (โˆ’1) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡น Austria 76.3 (โˆ’4) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ช Ireland 75.7 (+1) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ธ Iceland 74.5 (โ€”) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡พ Malaysia 74.4 (โˆ’2) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ Spain 74.2 (+8) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ช United Arab Emirates 73.4 (โˆ’10) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ China 72.6(โˆ’1) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Czech Republic 71.2 (+2) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ถ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Qatar 71 (โˆ’5)

2017โ€“2018 rankings

This is the top 30 of the 2017โ€“2018 report: โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ญ Switzerland 5.86 (โ€”) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ United States 5.85 (+1) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฌ Singapore 5.71 (โˆ’1) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Netherlands 5.66 (โ€”) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Germany 5.65 (โ€”) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Hong Kong 5.53 (+3) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ช Sweden 5.52 (โˆ’1) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง United Kingdom 5.51 (โˆ’1) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ต Japan 5.49 (โˆ’1) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ฎ Finland 5.49 (โ€”) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ด Norway 5.40 (โ€”) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Denmark 5.39 (โ€”) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฟ New Zealand 5.37 (โ€”) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Canada 5.35 (+1) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ผ Taiwan 5.33 (โˆ’1) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Israel 5.31 (+8) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ช United Arab Emirates 5.30 (โˆ’1) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡น Austria 5.25 (+1) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡บ Luxembourg 5.23 (+1) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ช Belgium 5.23 (โˆ’3) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ Australia 5.19 (+1) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท France 5.18 (โˆ’1) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡พ Malaysia 5.17 (+2) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ช Ireland 5.16 (โˆ’1) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ถ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Qatar 5.11 (โˆ’7) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ท South Korea 5.07 (โ€”) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ China 5.00 (+1) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ธ Iceland 4.99 (โˆ’1) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ช Estonia 4.85 (+1) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Saudi Arabia 4.83 (โˆ’1)

2016โ€“2017 rankings

This is the top 30 of the 2016โ€“2017 report: โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ญ Switzerland 5.81 (โ€”) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฌ Singapore 5.72 (โ€”) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ United States 5.7 (โ€”) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Netherlands 5.57 (+1) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Germany 5.57 (โˆ’1) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ช Sweden 5.53 (+3) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง United Kingdom 5.49 (+3) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ต Japan 5.48 (โˆ’2) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Hong Kong 5.48 (โˆ’2) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ฎ Finland 5.44 (โˆ’2) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ด Norway 5.44 (โ€”) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Denmark 5.35 (โ€”) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฟ New Zealand 5.31 (+3) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ผ Taiwan 5.28 (+1) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Canada 5.27 (โˆ’2) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ช United Arab Emirates 5.26 (+1) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ช Belgium 5.25 (+2) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ถ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Qatar 5.23 (โˆ’4) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡น Austria 5.22 (+4) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡บ Luxembourg 5.2 (โ€”) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท France 5.2 (+1) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ Australia 5.19 (โˆ’1) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ช Ireland 5.18 (+1) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Israel 5.18 (+3) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡พ Malaysia 5.16 (โˆ’7) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ท South Korea 5.03 (โ€”) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ธ Iceland 4.96 (+2) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ China 4.95 (โ€”) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Saudi Arabia 4.84 (โˆ’4) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ช Estonia 4.78 (โ€”)

2015โ€“2016 rankings

This is the top 30 of the 2015โ€“2016 report: โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ญ 5.76 (โ€”) โ€ข # 5.68 (โ€”) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ 5.61 (โ€”) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช 5.53 (+1) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ 5.50 (+3) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ต 5.47 (โ€”) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡ฐ 5.46 (โ€”) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ฎ 5.45 (โˆ’4) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ช 5.43 (+1) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง 5.43 (โˆ’1) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ด 5.41 (โ€”) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ฐ 5.33 (+1) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ 5.31 (+2) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ถ๐Ÿ‡ฆ 5.30 (+2) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ผ 5.28 (โˆ’1) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฟ 5.25 (+1) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ช 5.24 (โˆ’5) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡พ 5.23 (+2) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ช 5.20 (โˆ’1) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡บ 5.20 (โˆ’1) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ 5.15 (+1) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท 5.13 (+1) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡น 5.12 (โˆ’2) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ช 5.11 (+1) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฆ 5.07 (โˆ’1) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ท 4.98 (โ€”) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ 4.98 (โ€”) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ 4.89 (โ€”) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ธ 4.83 (+1) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ช 4.71 (โˆ’1)

2014โ€“2015 rankings

This is the top 30 of the 2014โ€“2015 report: โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ญ 5.80 (โ€”) โ€ข # 5.65 (โ€”) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ 5.54 (+2) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ฎ 5.50 (โˆ’1) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช 5.49 (โˆ’1) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ต 5.47 (+3) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡ฐ 5.46 (โ€”) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ 5.45 (โ€”) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง 5.41 (+1) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ช 5.41 (โˆ’4) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ด 5.35 (โ€”) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ช 5.33 (+7) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ฐ 5.29 (+2) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ผ 5.25 (โˆ’2) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ 5.24 (โˆ’1) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ถ๐Ÿ‡ฆ 5.26 (โˆ’3) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฟ 5.20 (+1) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ช 5.18 (โˆ’1) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡บ 5.17 (+3) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡พ 5.16 (+4) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡น 5.16 (โˆ’5) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ 5.08 (โˆ’1) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท 5.08 (โ€”) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฆ 5.06 (โˆ’4) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ช 4.98 (+3) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ท 4.96 (โˆ’1) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ 4.95 (โ€”) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ 4.89 (+1) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ช 4.71 (+3) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ธ 4.71 (+1)

2013โ€“2014 rankings

This is the top 30 of the 2013โ€“2014 report: โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ญ 5.67 (โ€”) โ€ข # 5.61 (โ€”) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ 5.54 (โ€”) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ฎ 5.51 (+2) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช 5.48 (+2) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ช 5.48 (โˆ’2) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡ฐ 5.47 (+2) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ 5.42 (โˆ’3) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ต 5.40 (+1) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง 5.37 (โˆ’2) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ด 5.33 (+4) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ผ 5.29 (+1) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ถ๐Ÿ‡ฆ 5.24 (โˆ’2) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ 5.20 (โ€”) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ฐ 5.18 (โˆ’3) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡น 5.15 (โ€”) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ช 5.13 (โ€”) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฟ 5.11 (+5) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ช 5.11 (+5) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฆ 5.10 (โˆ’2) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ 5.09 (โˆ’1) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡บ 5.09 (โ€”) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท 5.05 (โˆ’2) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡พ 5.03 (+1) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ท 5.01 (โˆ’6) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ณ 4.95 (+2) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ 4.94 (โˆ’1) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ช 4.92 (โˆ’1) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ 4.84 (โ€”) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ท 4.67 (+1)

2012โ€“2013 rankings

This is the top 30 of the 2012โ€“2013 report: โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ญ 5.72 (โ€”) โ€ข # 5.67 (โ€”) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ฎ 5.55 (+1) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ช 5.53 (โˆ’1) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ 5.50 (+2) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช 5.48 (โ€”) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ 5.47 (โˆ’2) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง 5.45 (+2) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡ฐ 5.41 (+2) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ต 5.40 (โˆ’1) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ถ๐Ÿ‡ฆ 5.38 (+3) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ฐ 5.29 (โˆ’4) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ผ 5.28 (โ€”) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ 5.27 (โˆ’2) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ด 5.27 (+1) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡น 5.22 (+3) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ช 5.21 (โˆ’2) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฆ 5.19 (+1) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ท 5.12 (+5) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ 5.12 (โ€”) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท 5.11 (โˆ’3) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡บ 5.09 (+1) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฟ 5.09 (+2) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ช 5.07 (+3) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡พ 5.06 (โˆ’4) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ 5.02 (โˆ’4) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ช 4.91 (+2) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ณ 4.87 (โ€”) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ 4.83 (โˆ’3) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ธ 4.74 (โ€”)

2011โ€“2012 rankings

This is the top 30 of the 2011โ€“2012 report: โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ญ 5.75 (โ€”) โ€ข # 5.63 (+1) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ช 5.61 (โˆ’1) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ฎ 5.47 (+3) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ 5.43 (โˆ’1) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช 5.41 (โˆ’1) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ 5.41 (+1) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ฐ 5.40 (+1) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ต 5.40 (โˆ’3) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง 5.39 (+2) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡ฐ 5.36 (โ€”) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ 5.33 (โˆ’2) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ผ 5.26 (โ€”) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ถ๐Ÿ‡ฆ 5.24 (+3) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ช 5.20 (+4) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ด 5.18 (โˆ’2) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฆ 5.17 (+4) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท 5.14 (โˆ’3) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡น 5.14 (โˆ’1) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ 5.11 (โˆ’4) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡พ 5.08 (+5) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ 5.07 (+2) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡บ 5.03 (โˆ’3) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ท 5.02 (โˆ’2) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฟ 4.93 (โˆ’2) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ 4.90 (+1) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ช 4.89 (โˆ’2) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ณ 4.78 (โ€”) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ช 4.77 (โ€”) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ธ 4.75 (+1)

2010โ€“2011 rankings

This is the top 30 of the 2010โ€“2011 report: โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ญ 5.63 (โ€”) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ช 5.56 (+2) โ€ข # 5.48 (โ€”) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ 5.43 (โ€“2) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช 5.39 (+2) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ต 5.37 (+2) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ฎ 5.37 (โ€“1) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ 5.33 (+2) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ฐ 5.32 (โ€“4) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ 5.30 (โ€“1) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡ฐ 5.27 (โ€”) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง 5.25 (+1) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ผ 5.21 (โ€“1) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ด 5.14 (โ€”) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท 5.13 (+1) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ 5.11 (โ€“1) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ถ๐Ÿ‡ฆ 5.10 (โ€”) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡น 5.09 (โ€“1) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ช 5.07 (โ€“1) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡บ 5.05 (+1) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฆ 4.95 (+6) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ท 4.93 (โ€”) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฟ 4.92 (โ€“3) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ 4.91 (+3) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ช 4.89 (โ€“2) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡พ 4.88 (โ€“2) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ 4.84 (+2) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ณ 4.75 (+4) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ช 4.74 (โ€“4) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฑ 4.69 (โ€”)

2009โ€“2010 rankings

This is the top 30 of the 2009โ€“2010 report: โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ญ 5.60 (+1) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ 5.59 (โ€“1) โ€ข # 5.55 (+2) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ช 5.51 (โ€”) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ฐ 5.46 (โ€“2) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ฎ 5.43 (โ€”) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช 5.37 (โ€”) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ต 5.37 (+1) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ 5.33 (+1) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ 5.32 (โ€“2) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡ฐ 5.22 (โ€”) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ผ 5.20 (+5) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง 5.19 (โ€“1) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ด 5.17 (+1) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ 5.15 (+3) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท 5.13 (โ€”) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡น 5.13 (โ€“3) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ช 5.09 (+1) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ท 5.00 (โ€“6) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฟ 4.98 (+4) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡บ 4.96 (+4) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ถ๐Ÿ‡ฆ 4.95 (+4) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ช 4.92 (+8) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡พ 4.87 (โ€“3) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ช 4.84 (โ€“3) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ธ 4.80 (โ€“6) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ 4.80 (โ€“4) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฆ 4.75 (โ€“1) โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ 4.74 (+1) โ€ข # 4.70 (+2)

2008โ€“2009 rankings

This is the top 30 of the 2008โ€“2009 report: โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ 5.74 โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ญ 5.61 โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ฐ 5.58 โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ช 5.53 โ€ข # 5.53 โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ฎ 5.50 โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช 5.46 โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ 5.41 โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ต 5.38 โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ 5.37 โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡ฐ 5.33 โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง 5.30 โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ท 5.28 โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡น 5.23 โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ด 5.22 โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท 5.22 โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ผ 5.22 โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ 5.20 โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ช 5.14 โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ธ 5.05 โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡พ 5.04 โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ช 4.99 โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ 4.97 โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฟ 4.93 โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡บ 4.85 โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ถ๐Ÿ‡ฆ 4.83 โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฆ 4.72 โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฑ 4.72 โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ 4.72 โ€ข # ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ 4.70 You can find the computation and structure of the GCI pp. 49โ€“50 of the Global Competitiveness Report 2013โ€“2014, Full Data Edition.

This article is derived from Wikipedia and licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0. View the original article.

Wikipediaยฎ is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.
Bliptext is not affiliated with or endorsed by Wikipedia or the Wikimedia Foundation.

View original