Contents
Global Competitiveness Report
The Global Competitiveness Report (GCR) was a yearly report published by the World Economic Forum. Between 2004 and 2020, the Global Competitiveness Report ranked countries based on the Global Competitiveness Index, developed by Xavier Sala-i-Martin and Elsa V. Artadi. Before that, the macroeconomic ranks were based on Jeffrey Sachs's Growth Development Index and the microeconomic ranks were based on Michael Porter's Business Competitiveness Index. The Global Competitiveness Index integrates the macroeconomic and the micro/business aspects of competitiveness into a single index. The report "assesses the ability of countries to provide high levels of prosperity to their citizens". This in turn depends on how productively a country uses available resources. Therefore, the Global Competitiveness Index measures the set of institutions, policies, and factors that set the sustainable current and medium-term levels of economic prosperity."
Description
Since 2004, the report ranks the world's nations according to the Global Competitiveness Index, based on the latest theoretical and empirical research. It is made up of over 110 variables, of which two thirds come from the Executive Opinion Survey, and one third comes from publicly available sources such as the United Nations. The variables are organized into twelve pillars, with each pillar representing an area considered as an important determinant of competitiveness. One part of the report is the Executive Opinion Survey, which is a survey of a representative sample of business leaders in their respective countries. Respondent numbers have increased every year and is currently just over 13,500 in 142 countries (2010). The report notes that as a nation develops, wages tend to increase, and that in order to sustain this higher income, labor productivity must improve for the nation to be competitive. In addition, what creates productivity in Sweden is necessarily different from what drives it in Ghana. Thus, the GCI separates countries into three specific stages: factor-driven, efficiency-driven, and innovation-driven, each implying a growing degree of complexity in the operation of the economy. The report has twelve pillars of competitiveness. These are: In the factor-driven stage countries compete based on their factor endowments, primarily unskilled labor and natural resources. Companies compete on the basis of prices and sell basic products or commodities, with their low productivity reflected in low wages. To maintain competitiveness at this stage of development, competitiveness hinges mainly on well-functioning public and private institutions (pillar 1), appropriate infrastructure (pillar 2), a stable macroeconomic framework (pillar 3), and good health and primary education (pillar 4). As wages rise with advancing development, countries move into the efficiency-driven stage of development, when they must begin to develop more efficient production processes and increase product quality. At this point, competitiveness becomes increasingly driven by higher education and training (pillar 5), efficient goods markets (pillar 6), efficient labor markets (pillar 7), developed financial markets (pillar 8), the ability to harness the benefits of existing technologies (pillar 9), and its market size, both domestic and international (pillar 10). Finally, as countries move into the innovation-driven stage, they are only able to sustain higher wages and a higher standard of living if their businesses are able to compete by providing new or unique products. At this stage, companies must compete by producing new and different goods using the most sophisticated production processes (pillar 11) and through innovation (pillar 12). Thus, the impact of each pillar on competitiveness varies across countries, in function of their stages of economic development. Therefore, in the calculation of the GCI, pillars are given different weights depending on the per capita income of the nation. The weights used are the values that best explain growth in recent years For example, the sophistication and innovation factors contribute 10% to the final score in factor and efficiency-driven economies, but 30% in innovation-driven economies. Intermediate values are used for economies in transition between stages. The Global Competitiveness Index's annual reports are somewhat similar to the Ease of Doing Business Index and the Indices of Economic Freedom, which also look at factors affecting economic growth (but not as many as the Global Competitiveness Report). Data from the Global Competitiveness Index relating to the strength of auditing and reporting standards, institutions and judicial independence is used in the Basel AML Index, a money laundering risk assessment tool developed by the Basel Institute on Governance.
Limitations
In spite of the World Economic Forum's Global Risks Report which is increasingly identifying environmental pressures as the dominant risks to humanity, none of the indicators used to determine this report's competitiveness ranking reflect any of the countries' environmental dimensions such as energy, water, climate risks, resource or food security, etc. The Global Competitiveness Report 2018 and 2019 used the ecological footprint as a context indicator, but the footprint was not included in the scoring algorithm that determines the ranking.
2019 rankings
This is the full ranking of the 2019 report:
2018 rankings
This is the top 30 of the 2018 report: ⢠# ðºðž United States 85.6 (+1) ⢠# ðžð¬ Singapore 83.5 (+1) ⢠# ð©ðª Germany 82.8 (+2) ⢠# ðšð Switzerland 82.6 (â3) ⢠# ð¯ðµ Japan 82.5 (+4) ⢠# ð³ð± Netherlands 82.4 (â2) ⢠# ðð° Hong Kong 82.3 (â1) ⢠# ð¬ð§ United Kingdom 82 (â) ⢠# ðžðª Sweden 81.7 (â2) ⢠# ð©ð° Denmark 80.6 (+2) ⢠# ð«ð® Finland 80.3 (â1) ⢠# ðšðŠ Canada 79.9 (+2) ⢠# ð¹ðŒ Taiwan 79.3 (+2) ⢠# ðŠðº Australia 78.9 (+7) ⢠# ð°ð· South Korea 78.8 (+11) ⢠# ð³ðŽ Norway 78.2 (â5) ⢠# ð«ð· France 78 (+5) ⢠# ð³ð¿ New Zealand 77.5 (â5) ⢠# ð±ðº Luxembourg 76.6 (â) ⢠# ð®ð± Israel 76.6 (â4) ⢠# ð§ðª Belgium 76.6 (â1) ⢠# ðŠð¹ Austria 76.3 (â4) ⢠# ð®ðª Ireland 75.7 (+1) ⢠# ð®ðž Iceland 74.5 (â) ⢠# ð²ðŸ Malaysia 74.4 (â2) ⢠# ðªðž Spain 74.2 (+8) ⢠# ðŠðª United Arab Emirates 73.4 (â10) ⢠# ðšð³ China 72.6(â1) ⢠# ðšð¿ Czech Republic 71.2 (+2) ⢠# ð¶ðŠ Qatar 71 (â5)
2017â2018 rankings
This is the top 30 of the 2017â2018 report: ⢠# ðšð Switzerland 5.86 (â) ⢠# ðºðž United States 5.85 (+1) ⢠# ðžð¬ Singapore 5.71 (â1) ⢠# ð³ð± Netherlands 5.66 (â) ⢠# ð©ðª Germany 5.65 (â) ⢠# ðð° Hong Kong 5.53 (+3) ⢠# ðžðª Sweden 5.52 (â1) ⢠# ð¬ð§ United Kingdom 5.51 (â1) ⢠# ð¯ðµ Japan 5.49 (â1) ⢠# ð«ð® Finland 5.49 (â) ⢠# ð³ðŽ Norway 5.40 (â) ⢠# ð©ð° Denmark 5.39 (â) ⢠# ð³ð¿ New Zealand 5.37 (â) ⢠# ðšðŠ Canada 5.35 (+1) ⢠# ð¹ðŒ Taiwan 5.33 (â1) ⢠# ð®ð± Israel 5.31 (+8) ⢠# ðŠðª United Arab Emirates 5.30 (â1) ⢠# ðŠð¹ Austria 5.25 (+1) ⢠# ð±ðº Luxembourg 5.23 (+1) ⢠# ð§ðª Belgium 5.23 (â3) ⢠# ðŠðº Australia 5.19 (+1) ⢠# ð«ð· France 5.18 (â1) ⢠# ð²ðŸ Malaysia 5.17 (+2) ⢠# ð®ðª Ireland 5.16 (â1) ⢠# ð¶ðŠ Qatar 5.11 (â7) ⢠# ð°ð· South Korea 5.07 (â) ⢠# ðšð³ China 5.00 (+1) ⢠# ð®ðž Iceland 4.99 (â1) ⢠# ðªðª Estonia 4.85 (+1) ⢠# ðžðŠ Saudi Arabia 4.83 (â1)
2016â2017 rankings
This is the top 30 of the 2016â2017 report: ⢠# ðšð Switzerland 5.81 (â) ⢠# ðžð¬ Singapore 5.72 (â) ⢠# ðºðž United States 5.7 (â) ⢠# ð³ð± Netherlands 5.57 (+1) ⢠# ð©ðª Germany 5.57 (â1) ⢠# ðžðª Sweden 5.53 (+3) ⢠# ð¬ð§ United Kingdom 5.49 (+3) ⢠# ð¯ðµ Japan 5.48 (â2) ⢠# ðð° Hong Kong 5.48 (â2) ⢠# ð«ð® Finland 5.44 (â2) ⢠# ð³ðŽ Norway 5.44 (â) ⢠# ð©ð° Denmark 5.35 (â) ⢠# ð³ð¿ New Zealand 5.31 (+3) ⢠# ð¹ðŒ Taiwan 5.28 (+1) ⢠# ðšðŠ Canada 5.27 (â2) ⢠# ðŠðª United Arab Emirates 5.26 (+1) ⢠# ð§ðª Belgium 5.25 (+2) ⢠# ð¶ðŠ Qatar 5.23 (â4) ⢠# ðŠð¹ Austria 5.22 (+4) ⢠# ð±ðº Luxembourg 5.2 (â) ⢠# ð«ð· France 5.2 (+1) ⢠# ðŠðº Australia 5.19 (â1) ⢠# ð®ðª Ireland 5.18 (+1) ⢠# ð®ð± Israel 5.18 (+3) ⢠# ð²ðŸ Malaysia 5.16 (â7) ⢠# ð°ð· South Korea 5.03 (â) ⢠# ð®ðž Iceland 4.96 (+2) ⢠# ðšð³ China 4.95 (â) ⢠# ðžðŠ Saudi Arabia 4.84 (â4) ⢠# ðªðª Estonia 4.78 (â)
2015â2016 rankings
This is the top 30 of the 2015â2016 report: ⢠# ðšð 5.76 (â) ⢠# 5.68 (â) ⢠# ðºðž 5.61 (â) ⢠# ð©ðª 5.53 (+1) ⢠# ð³ð± 5.50 (+3) ⢠# ð¯ðµ 5.47 (â) ⢠# ðð° 5.46 (â) ⢠# ð«ð® 5.45 (â4) ⢠# ðžðª 5.43 (+1) ⢠# ð¬ð§ 5.43 (â1) ⢠# ð³ðŽ 5.41 (â) ⢠# ð©ð° 5.33 (+1) ⢠# ðšðŠ 5.31 (+2) ⢠# ð¶ðŠ 5.30 (+2) ⢠# ð¹ðŒ 5.28 (â1) ⢠# ð³ð¿ 5.25 (+1) ⢠# ðŠðª 5.24 (â5) ⢠# ð²ðŸ 5.23 (+2) ⢠# ð§ðª 5.20 (â1) ⢠# ð±ðº 5.20 (â1) ⢠# ðŠðº 5.15 (+1) ⢠# ð«ð· 5.13 (+1) ⢠# ðŠð¹ 5.12 (â2) ⢠# ð®ðª 5.11 (+1) ⢠# ðžðŠ 5.07 (â1) ⢠# ð°ð· 4.98 (â) ⢠# ð®ð± 4.98 (â) ⢠# ðšð³ 4.89 (â) ⢠# ð®ðž 4.83 (+1) ⢠# ðªðª 4.71 (â1)
2014â2015 rankings
This is the top 30 of the 2014â2015 report: ⢠# ðšð 5.80 (â) ⢠# 5.65 (â) ⢠# ðºðž 5.54 (+2) ⢠# ð«ð® 5.50 (â1) ⢠# ð©ðª 5.49 (â1) ⢠# ð¯ðµ 5.47 (+3) ⢠# ðð° 5.46 (â) ⢠# ð³ð± 5.45 (â) ⢠# ð¬ð§ 5.41 (+1) ⢠# ðžðª 5.41 (â4) ⢠# ð³ðŽ 5.35 (â) ⢠# ðŠðª 5.33 (+7) ⢠# ð©ð° 5.29 (+2) ⢠# ð¹ðŒ 5.25 (â2) ⢠# ðšðŠ 5.24 (â1) ⢠# ð¶ðŠ 5.26 (â3) ⢠# ð³ð¿ 5.20 (+1) ⢠# ð§ðª 5.18 (â1) ⢠# ð±ðº 5.17 (+3) ⢠# ð²ðŸ 5.16 (+4) ⢠# ðŠð¹ 5.16 (â5) ⢠# ðŠðº 5.08 (â1) ⢠# ð«ð· 5.08 (â) ⢠# ðžðŠ 5.06 (â4) ⢠# ð®ðª 4.98 (+3) ⢠# ð°ð· 4.96 (â1) ⢠# ð®ð± 4.95 (â) ⢠# ðšð³ 4.89 (+1) ⢠# ðªðª 4.71 (+3) ⢠# ð®ðž 4.71 (+1)
2013â2014 rankings
This is the top 30 of the 2013â2014 report: ⢠# ðšð 5.67 (â) ⢠# 5.61 (â) ⢠# ðºðž 5.54 (â) ⢠# ð«ð® 5.51 (+2) ⢠# ð©ðª 5.48 (+2) ⢠# ðžðª 5.48 (â2) ⢠# ðð° 5.47 (+2) ⢠# ð³ð± 5.42 (â3) ⢠# ð¯ðµ 5.40 (+1) ⢠# ð¬ð§ 5.37 (â2) ⢠# ð³ðŽ 5.33 (+4) ⢠# ð¹ðŒ 5.29 (+1) ⢠# ð¶ðŠ 5.24 (â2) ⢠# ðšðŠ 5.20 (â) ⢠# ð©ð° 5.18 (â3) ⢠# ðŠð¹ 5.15 (â) ⢠# ð§ðª 5.13 (â) ⢠# ð³ð¿ 5.11 (+5) ⢠# ðŠðª 5.11 (+5) ⢠# ðžðŠ 5.10 (â2) ⢠# ðŠðº 5.09 (â1) ⢠# ð±ðº 5.09 (â) ⢠# ð«ð· 5.05 (â2) ⢠# ð²ðŸ 5.03 (+1) ⢠# ð°ð· 5.01 (â6) ⢠# ð§ð³ 4.95 (+2) ⢠# ð®ð± 4.94 (â1) ⢠# ð®ðª 4.92 (â1) ⢠# ðšð³ 4.84 (â) ⢠# ðµð· 4.67 (+1)
2012â2013 rankings
This is the top 30 of the 2012â2013 report: ⢠# ðšð 5.72 (â) ⢠# 5.67 (â) ⢠# ð«ð® 5.55 (+1) ⢠# ðžðª 5.53 (â1) ⢠# ð³ð± 5.50 (+2) ⢠# ð©ðª 5.48 (â) ⢠# ðºðž 5.47 (â2) ⢠# ð¬ð§ 5.45 (+2) ⢠# ðð° 5.41 (+2) ⢠# ð¯ðµ 5.40 (â1) ⢠# ð¶ðŠ 5.38 (+3) ⢠# ð©ð° 5.29 (â4) ⢠# ð¹ðŒ 5.28 (â) ⢠# ðšðŠ 5.27 (â2) ⢠# ð³ðŽ 5.27 (+1) ⢠# ðŠð¹ 5.22 (+3) ⢠# ð§ðª 5.21 (â2) ⢠# ðžðŠ 5.19 (+1) ⢠# ð°ð· 5.12 (+5) ⢠# ðŠðº 5.12 (â) ⢠# ð«ð· 5.11 (â3) ⢠# ð±ðº 5.09 (+1) ⢠# ð³ð¿ 5.09 (+2) ⢠# ðŠðª 5.07 (+3) ⢠# ð²ðŸ 5.06 (â4) ⢠# ð®ð± 5.02 (â4) ⢠# ð®ðª 4.91 (+2) ⢠# ð§ð³ 4.87 (â) ⢠# ðšð³ 4.83 (â3) ⢠# ð®ðž 4.74 (â)
2011â2012 rankings
This is the top 30 of the 2011â2012 report: ⢠# ðšð 5.75 (â) ⢠# 5.63 (+1) ⢠# ðžðª 5.61 (â1) ⢠# ð«ð® 5.47 (+3) ⢠# ðºðž 5.43 (â1) ⢠# ð©ðª 5.41 (â1) ⢠# ð³ð± 5.41 (+1) ⢠# ð©ð° 5.40 (+1) ⢠# ð¯ðµ 5.40 (â3) ⢠# ð¬ð§ 5.39 (+2) ⢠# ðð° 5.36 (â) ⢠# ðšðŠ 5.33 (â2) ⢠# ð¹ðŒ 5.26 (â) ⢠# ð¶ðŠ 5.24 (+3) ⢠# ð§ðª 5.20 (+4) ⢠# ð³ðŽ 5.18 (â2) ⢠# ðžðŠ 5.17 (+4) ⢠# ð«ð· 5.14 (â3) ⢠# ðŠð¹ 5.14 (â1) ⢠# ðŠðº 5.11 (â4) ⢠# ð²ðŸ 5.08 (+5) ⢠# ð®ð± 5.07 (+2) ⢠# ð±ðº 5.03 (â3) ⢠# ð°ð· 5.02 (â2) ⢠# ð³ð¿ 4.93 (â2) ⢠# ðšð³ 4.90 (+1) ⢠# ðŠðª 4.89 (â2) ⢠# ð§ð³ 4.78 (â) ⢠# ð®ðª 4.77 (â) ⢠# ð®ðž 4.75 (+1)
2010â2011 rankings
This is the top 30 of the 2010â2011 report: ⢠# ðšð 5.63 (â) ⢠# ðžðª 5.56 (+2) ⢠# 5.48 (â) ⢠# ðºðž 5.43 (â2) ⢠# ð©ðª 5.39 (+2) ⢠# ð¯ðµ 5.37 (+2) ⢠# ð«ð® 5.37 (â1) ⢠# ð³ð± 5.33 (+2) ⢠# ð©ð° 5.32 (â4) ⢠# ðšðŠ 5.30 (â1) ⢠# ðð° 5.27 (â) ⢠# ð¬ð§ 5.25 (+1) ⢠# ð¹ðŒ 5.21 (â1) ⢠# ð³ðŽ 5.14 (â) ⢠# ð«ð· 5.13 (+1) ⢠# ðŠðº 5.11 (â1) ⢠# ð¶ðŠ 5.10 (â) ⢠# ðŠð¹ 5.09 (â1) ⢠# ð§ðª 5.07 (â1) ⢠# ð±ðº 5.05 (+1) ⢠# ðžðŠ 4.95 (+6) ⢠# ð°ð· 4.93 (â) ⢠# ð³ð¿ 4.92 (â3) ⢠# ð®ð± 4.91 (+3) ⢠# ðŠðª 4.89 (â2) ⢠# ð²ðŸ 4.88 (â2) ⢠# ðšð³ 4.84 (+2) ⢠# ð§ð³ 4.75 (+4) ⢠# ð®ðª 4.74 (â4) ⢠# ðšð± 4.69 (â)
2009â2010 rankings
This is the top 30 of the 2009â2010 report: ⢠# ðšð 5.60 (+1) ⢠# ðºðž 5.59 (â1) ⢠# 5.55 (+2) ⢠# ðžðª 5.51 (â) ⢠# ð©ð° 5.46 (â2) ⢠# ð«ð® 5.43 (â) ⢠# ð©ðª 5.37 (â) ⢠# ð¯ðµ 5.37 (+1) ⢠# ðšðŠ 5.33 (+1) ⢠# ð³ð± 5.32 (â2) ⢠# ðð° 5.22 (â) ⢠# ð¹ðŒ 5.20 (+5) ⢠# ð¬ð§ 5.19 (â1) ⢠# ð³ðŽ 5.17 (+1) ⢠# ðŠðº 5.15 (+3) ⢠# ð«ð· 5.13 (â) ⢠# ðŠð¹ 5.13 (â3) ⢠# ð§ðª 5.09 (+1) ⢠# ð°ð· 5.00 (â6) ⢠# ð³ð¿ 4.98 (+4) ⢠# ð±ðº 4.96 (+4) ⢠# ð¶ðŠ 4.95 (+4) ⢠# ðŠðª 4.92 (+8) ⢠# ð²ðŸ 4.87 (â3) ⢠# ð®ðª 4.84 (â3) ⢠# ð®ðž 4.80 (â6) ⢠# ð®ð± 4.80 (â4) ⢠# ðžðŠ 4.75 (â1) ⢠# ðšð³ 4.74 (+1) ⢠# 4.70 (+2)
2008â2009 rankings
This is the top 30 of the 2008â2009 report: ⢠# ðºðž 5.74 ⢠# ðšð 5.61 ⢠# ð©ð° 5.58 ⢠# ðžðª 5.53 ⢠# 5.53 ⢠# ð«ð® 5.50 ⢠# ð©ðª 5.46 ⢠# ð³ð± 5.41 ⢠# ð¯ðµ 5.38 ⢠# ðšðŠ 5.37 ⢠# ðð° 5.33 ⢠# ð¬ð§ 5.30 ⢠# ð°ð· 5.28 ⢠# ðŠð¹ 5.23 ⢠# ð³ðŽ 5.22 ⢠# ð«ð· 5.22 ⢠# ð¹ðŒ 5.22 ⢠# ðŠðº 5.20 ⢠# ð§ðª 5.14 ⢠# ð®ðž 5.05 ⢠# ð²ðŸ 5.04 ⢠# ð®ðª 4.99 ⢠# ð®ð± 4.97 ⢠# ð³ð¿ 4.93 ⢠# ð±ðº 4.85 ⢠# ð¶ðŠ 4.83 ⢠# ðžðŠ 4.72 ⢠# ðšð± 4.72 ⢠# ðªðž 4.72 ⢠# ðšð³ 4.70 You can find the computation and structure of the GCI pp. 49â50 of the Global Competitiveness Report 2013â2014, Full Data Edition.
This article is derived from Wikipedia and licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0. View the original article.
Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the
Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.
Bliptext is not
affiliated with or endorsed by Wikipedia or the
Wikimedia Foundation.