Wang Hui (Yangzhou, 10 October 1959) is a professor in the Department of Chinese Language and Literature, Tsinghua University, Beijing.

Biography

Wang Hui was born in Yangzhou, Jiangsu, in 10 October 1959. After finishing high school in Yangzhou, Wang Hui worked for two years as a factory worker before entering college. He completed his undergraduate studies at Yangzhou University (then Yangzhou Normal College), and then graduate studies at Nanjing University and the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, where he received his Ph.D. in 1988. Wang Hui was a participant in the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests. He was investigated about his involvement, but nothing significant or serious was found. He was later sent to accumulate experience in Shangluo, Shaanxi, for one year. His researches focus on contemporary Chinese literature and intellectual history. He was the executive editor (with Huang Ping) of the influential magazine Dushu (读书, Reading) from May 1996 to July 2007. The US magazine Foreign Policy named him as one of the top 100 public intellectuals in the world in May 2008. Wang Hui has been Visiting Professor at Harvard, Edinburgh, Bologna (Italy), Stanford, UCLA, Berkeley, and the University of Washington, among others. In March 2010, he appeared as the keynote speaker at the annual meeting for the Association for Asian Studies.

Political stance

Wang has been called the leader of the Chinese New Left, but he has refused this label: Chinese intellectuals such as Xu Jilin and Chen Ziming point out the affinity between Wang Hui and Chinese neoconservatism in defense of party-state dictatorship. Scholar Chen Chun wrote in 2022 that Wang Hui has been generally compared with nationalists in Chinese academic circles, especially after 2010, most of Wang Hui's statements could be used to defend the leadership of the Chinese Communist Party.

Controversies

Cheung Kong Dushu Prize

Wang Hui was involved in the controversy following the results of the Cheung Kong Dushu Prize (长江读书奖) in 2000. The prize was set up by Sir Ka-shing Li, which awards one million RMB in total to be shared by the winners. The 3 recipients of the prize in 2000 were Wang Hui, who served as the coordinator of the academic selection committee of the prize, Fei Xiaotong, the Honorary Chairman of the committee, and Qian Liqun, another committee member. Wang Hui was then the editor-in-chief of Dushu magazine, which was the administrative body of the prize. The Cheung Kong Dushu (Reading) prize “controversy” was used as a case study in Barme and Davies’s and demonstrated the bitterness and hostility of two factional camps of Chinese intellectuals based in Beijing and Shanghai and who labelled each other as “Neoliberal’ and “New Leftist.” (p87) Under the bickering attack of “unethical wrongdoings, nepotism and intellectual thuggery” and “equity in the complex workings of global capital condemnation what was perceived to be unethical”,(p87) Wang Hui was accused of awarding to himself a prestigious “humanistic” (p94) and seemingly a relatively high monetary value from the “New Left-dominant selection committee” in which Wang Hui was a member. This triggered a heated brawl over the internet circle between the two camps with the defense accusing the other on the “jealousy” over Wang’s relative meteoritic rise to international fame. The award of the prize nonetheless generated diverse range of discussion modes in cyberspace debate in the then contemporary “still nascent Chinese cyber Public space”(p99) from the authors. The accusation of collective resentment and betrayal, catering to left leaning Anglophone scholars with their EuroAmerican cultural thought, (p88), assumption of political-moral authority and thereby Chinese cultural legitimacy as “rightful” inheritance of Chinese cultural capital (p97) were all used as weapons of attack that include such mention as “moral high ground” (p89), “financial conflict” (p93) , “intellectual autonomy” (p88), decay of intellectual friendship (p95), and even historical precedent of intellectual debate in early Northern Song and late Ming (p95) as weapons of assault. The “neo-liberalist” group composed of intellect such as Dai Qing (p85), Liu Junning,(p90) Xu Youyu (p90), Wu Jiaxing,(p91) and Zhao Chunming.(p92, 93) and the rival “New Leftist” lead by Wang Hui himself and Yan Gan (p92), Fan Yong (founder and publisher of the Reading) (p88), and Cui Zhuyuan (p92) came to their defense of the other in their “malicious assault, groundless attacks and the exploitation of intellectual sphere. ” (p98) They declined “New leftist” such label as they are seen as a “western interpretation” and the historical incorrect connotation of “failed left of the Cultural Revolution and the Maoist past within mainland Chinese discourse.” (p90)

Allegations of plagiarism

Wang Binbin, a professor of literature from Nanjing University, accused Wang Hui of plagiarism, citing what he deemed to be improper use of footnote protocols and incorrectly cited passages in Wang’s doctoral dissertation on Lu Xun 《反抗绝望》 (Against Despair). Wang Binbin's accusation was first published on an academic journal, and reappeared on Southern Weekly on March 25, 2010. Wang Binbin further suggested that Wang Hui, in his The Rise of Modern Chinese Thought, may have used R. G. Collingwood's canonical book, The Idea of History, with or without proper citations. Apart from Wang Binbin's findings, an analysis of Wang Hui's weak use of footnotes by Xiang Yihua, a researcher with the Zhejiang Academy of Social Sciences, revealed other sections incorporating sources without citation. He also published a review of Wang Hui's essay 《“赛先生”在中国的命运》 (English translation: "The Fate of 'Mr. Science' in China" ), questioning the originality of his research. Online commentators found some paragraphs in Against Despair to be copied verbatim from other sources. Authors such as M. B. Khrapchenko and F. C. Copleston were used without acknowledgment to either the original works or their translations. Some scholars are concerned over the plagiarism accusations. Lin Yu-sheng says that some of the plagiarism charges are sustained, which is concurred by Yu Ying-shih. An open letter signed by more than 60 scholars called for the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences and Tsinghua University to investigate the plagiarism case. Some international scholars and weblog authors have come to Wang's defense, noting that this is mostly a case of sloppy citation practice, not actual plagiarism. A letter signed by 96 scholars, addressed to the authority of Tsinghua University, endorsing Wang Hui's scholarly integrity was made public on 9 July. Most of the passages highlighted by Wang Binbin did actually have citations to the original works, asking readers to "consult" those works. It is argued that there is no attempt by Wang Hui to hide the sources of the sections in question, even if the citations were, at times, nonstandard.

Unauthorized republication and censorship of CAS articles

On October 25, 2017, the director and the editors of the journal Critical Asian Studies issued a statement in regard to the republication and censorship of two articles from the journal without either the authors' or the publisher's permission. The two articles are Claudia Pozzana and Alessandro Russo's "China's New Order and Past Disorders: A Dialogue Starting from Wang Hui's Analysis" (2006), and their "Continuity/Discontinuity: China's Place in the Contemporary World" (2011). According to the statement, the 2006 article was censored and republished in a Chinese journal edited by Wang Hui himself in 2015, and the 2011 article was republished in 2014, unauthorized. In the censored republications, passages concerning Tiananmen Square protests of 1989 were deleted.

Work

Wang has authored dozens of books, articles, and public statements on the scholarly and socio-political issues of the day. Some of his work has been translated into English and other languages. Wang Hui’s monographs include, in Chinese: His books, translated into English, include: