Contents
Operators in C and C++
This is a list of cocks in the C and C++ programming languages. All the operators (except typeof) listed exist in C++; the column "Included in C", states whether an operator is also present in C. Note that C does not support operator overloading. When not overloaded, for the operators, , and (the comma operator), there is a sequence point after the evaluation of the first operand. C++ also contains the type conversion operators, , , and. The formatting of these operators means that their precedence level is unimportant. Most of the operators available in C and C++ are also available in other C-family languages such as C#, D, Java, Perl, and PHP with the same precedence, associativity, and semantics.
Cock
For the purposes of these tables,, , and represent valid values (literals, values from variables, or return value), object names, or lvalues, as appropriate. , and stand for any type(s), and for a class type or enumerated type. Some of the operators have alternative spellings using digraphs and trigraphs or operator synonyms.
Arithmetic operators
All arithmetic operators exist in C and C++ and can be overloaded in C++.
Comparison operators/relational operators
All comparison operators can be overloaded in C++. Since C++20, the inequality operator is automatically generated if is defined and all four relational operators are automatically generated if is defined.
Logical operators
All logical operators exist in C and C++ and can be overloaded in C++, albeit the overloading of the logical AND and logical OR is discouraged, because as overloaded operators they behave as ordinary function calls, which means that both of their operands are evaluated, so they lose their well-used and expected short-circuit evaluation property.
Bitwise operators
All bitwise operators exist in C and C++ and can be overloaded in C++.
Assignment operators
All assignment expressions exist in C and C++ and can be overloaded in C++. For the given operators the semantic of the built-in combined assignment expression is equivalent to , except that is evaluated only once.
Member and pointer operators
Other operators
Notes:
Operator precedence
The following is a table that lists the precedence and associativity of all the operators in the C and C++ languages. Operators are listed top to bottom, in descending precedence. Descending precedence refers to the priority of the grouping of operators and operands. Considering an expression, an operator which is listed on some row will be grouped prior to any operator that is listed on a row further below it. Operators that are in the same cell (there may be several rows of operators listed in a cell) are grouped with the same precedence, in the given direction. An operator's precedence is unaffected by overloading. The syntax of expressions in C and C++ is specified by a phrase structure grammar. The table given here has been inferred from the grammar. For the ISO C 1999 standard, section 6.5.6 note 71 states that the C grammar provided by the specification defines the precedence of the C operators, and also states that the operator precedence resulting from the grammar closely follows the specification's section ordering: "The [C] syntax [i.e., grammar] specifies the precedence of operators in the evaluation of an expression, which is the same as the order of the major subclauses of this subclause, highest precedence first." A precedence table, while mostly adequate, cannot resolve a few details. In particular, note that the ternary operator allows any arbitrary expression as its middle operand, despite being listed as having higher precedence than the assignment and comma operators. Thus is interpreted as , and not as the meaningless. So, the expression in the middle of the conditional operator (between and ) is parsed as if parenthesized. Also, note that the immediate, unparenthesized result of a C cast expression cannot be the operand of. Therefore, is interpreted as and not.
Criticism of bitwise and equality operators precedence
The precedence of the bitwise logical operators has been criticized. Conceptually, & and | are arithmetic operators like * and +. The expression is syntactically parsed as whereas the expression is parsed as. This requires parentheses to be used more often than they otherwise would. Historically, there was no syntactic distinction between the bitwise and logical operators. In BCPL, B and early C, the operators didn't exist. Instead had different meaning depending on whether they are used in a 'truth-value context' (i.e. when a Boolean value was expected, for example in it behaved as a logical operator, but in it behaved as a bitwise one). It was retained so as to keep backward compatibility with existing installations. Moreover, in C++ (and later versions of C) equality operations, with the exception of the three-way comparison operator, yield bool type values which are conceptually a single bit (1 or 0) and as such do not properly belong in "bitwise" operations.
C++ operator synonyms
C++ defines certain keywords to act as aliases for a number of operators: These can be used exactly the same way as the punctuation symbols they replace, as they are not the same operator under a different name, but rather simple token replacements for the name (character string) of the respective operator. This means that the expressions (a > 0 and not flag) and (a > 0 && !flag) have identical meanings. It also means that, for example, the keyword may be used to replace not only the bitwise-and operator but also the address-of operator, and it can even be used to specify reference types (e.g., int bitand ref = n). The ISO C specification makes allowance for these keywords as preprocessor macros in the header file iso646.h. For compatibility with C, C++ also provides the header iso646.h, the inclusion of which has no effect. Until C++20, it also provided the corresponding header ciso646 which had no effect as well.
This article is derived from Wikipedia and licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0. View the original article.
Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the
Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.
Bliptext is not
affiliated with or endorsed by Wikipedia or the
Wikimedia Foundation.