Contents
Monotone likelihood ratio
Intuition
The MLRP is used to represent a data-generating process that enjoys a straightforward relationship between the magnitude of some observed variable and the distribution it draws from. If \ f(x)\ satisfies the MLRP with respect to \ g(x), the higher the observed value \ x, the more likely it was drawn from distribution \ f\ rather than \ g ~. As usual for monotonic relationships, the likelihood ratio's monotonicity comes in handy in statistics, particularly when using maximum-likelihood estimation. Also, distribution families with MLR have a number of well-behaved stochastic properties, such as first-order stochastic dominance and increasing hazard ratios. Unfortunately, as is also usual, the strength of this assumption comes at the price of realism. Many processes in the world do not exhibit a monotonic correspondence between input and output.
Example: Working hard or slacking off
Suppose you are working on a project, and you can either work hard or slack off. Call your choice of effort \ e\ and the quality of the resulting project \ q ~. If the MLRP holds for the distribution of \ q\ conditional on your effort \ e, the higher the quality the more likely you worked hard. Conversely, the lower the quality the more likely you slacked off. Hence if some employer is doing a "performance review" he can infer his employee's behavior from the merits of his work.
Families of distributions satisfying MLR
Statistical models often assume that data are generated by a distribution from some family of distributions and seek to determine that distribution. This task is simplified if the family has the monotone likelihood ratio property (MLRP). A family of density functions indexed by a parameter \ \theta\ taking values in an ordered set \ \Theta\ is said to have a monotone likelihood ratio (MLR) in the statistic \ T(X)\ if for any Then we say the family of distributions "has MLR in \ T(X)".
List of families
Hypothesis testing
If the family of random variables has the MLRP in \ T(X), a uniformly most powerful test can easily be determined for the hypothesis versus
Example: Effort and output
Example: Let \ e\ be an input into a stochastic technology – worker's effort, for instance – and \ y\ its output, the likelihood of which is described by a probability density function \ f(y;e) ~. Then the monotone likelihood ratio property (MLRP) of the family \ f\ is expressed as follows: For any the fact that e_2 > e_1 implies that the ratio is increasing in \ y ~.
Relation to other statistical properties
Monotone likelihoods are used in several areas of statistical theory, including point estimation and hypothesis testing, as well as in probability models.
Exponential families
One-parameter exponential families have monotone likelihood-functions. In particular, the one-dimensional exponential family of probability density functions or probability mass functions with has a monotone non-decreasing likelihood ratio in the sufficient statistic \ T(x), provided that is non-decreasing.
Uniformly most powerful tests: The Karlin–Rubin theorem
Monotone likelihood functions are used to construct uniformly most powerful tests, according to the Karlin–Rubin theorem. Consider a scalar measurement having a probability density function parameterized by a scalar parameter \ \theta, and define the likelihood ratio If \ \ell(x)\ is monotone non-decreasing, in \ x, for any pair (meaning that the greater \ x\ is, the more likely \ H_1\ is), then the threshold test: is the UMP test of size \ \alpha\ for testing vs. Note that exactly the same test is also UMP for testing vs.
Median unbiased estimation
Monotone likelihood-functions are used to construct median-unbiased estimators, using methods specified by Johann Pfanzagl and others. One such procedure is an analogue of the Rao–Blackwell procedure for mean-unbiased estimators: The procedure holds for a smaller class of probability distributions than does the Rao–Blackwell procedure for mean-unbiased estimation but for a larger class of loss functions.
Lifetime analysis: Survival analysis and reliability
If a family of distributions has the monotone likelihood ratio property in \ T(X)\ , But not conversely: neither monotone hazard rates nor stochastic dominance imply the MLRP.
Proofs
Let distribution family \ f_\theta\ satisfy MLR in \ x, so that for and or equivalently: Integrating this expression twice, we obtain:
First-order stochastic dominance
Combine the two inequalities above to get first-order dominance:
Monotone hazard rate
Use only the second inequality above to get a monotone hazard rate:
Uses
Economics
The MLR is an important condition on the type distribution of agents in mechanism design and economics of information, where Paul Milgrom defined "favorableness" of signals (in terms of stochastic dominance) as a consequence of MLR. Most solutions to mechanism design models assume type distributions that satisfy the MLR to take advantage of solution methods that may be easier to apply and interpret.
This article is derived from Wikipedia and licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0. View the original article.
Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the
Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.
Bliptext is not
affiliated with or endorsed by Wikipedia or the
Wikimedia Foundation.