In mathematics, specifically abstract algebra, the isomorphism theorems (also known as Noether's isomorphism theorems) are theorems that describe the relationship among quotients, homomorphisms, and subobjects. Versions of the theorems exist for groups, rings, vector spaces, modules, Lie algebras, and other algebraic structures. In universal algebra, the isomorphism theorems can be generalized to the context of algebras and congruences.

History

The isomorphism theorems were formulated in some generality for homomorphisms of modules by Emmy Noether in her paper Abstrakter Aufbau der Idealtheorie in algebraischen Zahl- und Funktionenkörpern, which was published in 1927 in Mathematische Annalen. Less general versions of these theorems can be found in work of Richard Dedekind and previous papers by Noether. Three years later, B.L. van der Waerden published his influential Moderne Algebra, the first abstract algebra textbook that took the groups-rings-fields approach to the subject. Van der Waerden credited lectures by Noether on group theory and Emil Artin on algebra, as well as a seminar conducted by Artin, Wilhelm Blaschke, Otto Schreier, and van der Waerden himself on ideals as the main references. The three isomorphism theorems, called homomorphism theorem, and two laws of isomorphism when applied to groups, appear explicitly.

Groups

We first present the isomorphism theorems of the groups.

Theorem A (groups)

Let G and H be groups, and let f : G → H be a homomorphism. Then: In particular, if f is surjective then H is isomorphic to G / ker(f). This theorem is usually called the first isomorphism theorem.

Theorem B (groups)

Let G be a group. Let S be a subgroup of G, and let N be a normal subgroup of G. Then the following hold: Technically, it is not necessary for N to be a normal subgroup, as long as S is a subgroup of the normalizer of N in G. In this case, N is not a normal subgroup of G, but N is still a normal subgroup of the product SN. This theorem is sometimes called the second isomorphism theorem, diamond theorem or the parallelogram theorem. An application of the second isomorphism theorem identifies projective linear groups: for example, the group on the complex projective line starts with setting, the group of invertible 2 × 2 complex matrices, , the subgroup of determinant 1 matrices, and N the normal subgroup of scalar matrices , we have , where I is the identity matrix, and. Then the second isomorphism theorem states that:

Theorem C (groups)

Let G be a group, and N a normal subgroup of G. Then The last statement is sometimes referred to as the third isomorphism theorem. The first four statements are often subsumed under Theorem D below, and referred to as the lattice theorem, correspondence theorem, or fourth isomorphism theorem.

Theorem D (groups)

Let G be a group, and N a normal subgroup of G. The canonical projection homomorphism defines a bijective correspondence between the set of subgroups of G containing N and the set of (all) subgroups of G/N. Under this correspondence normal subgroups correspond to normal subgroups. This theorem is sometimes called the correspondence theorem, the lattice theorem, and the fourth isomorphism theorem. The Zassenhaus lemma (also known as the butterfly lemma) is sometimes called the fourth isomorphism theorem.

Discussion

The first isomorphism theorem can be expressed in category theoretical language by saying that the category of groups is (normal epi, mono)-factorizable; in other words, the normal epimorphisms and the monomorphisms form a factorization system for the category. This is captured in the commutative diagram in the margin, which shows the objects and morphisms whose existence can be deduced from the morphism. The diagram shows that every morphism in the category of groups has a kernel in the category theoretical sense; the arbitrary morphism f factors into, where ι is a monomorphism and π is an epimorphism (in a conormal category, all epimorphisms are normal). This is represented in the diagram by an object \ker f and a monomorphism (kernels are always monomorphisms), which complete the short exact sequence running from the lower left to the upper right of the diagram. The use of the exact sequence convention saves us from having to draw the zero morphisms from \ker f to H and G / \ker f. If the sequence is right split (i.e., there is a morphism σ that maps to a π-preimage of itself), then G is the semidirect product of the normal subgroup and the subgroup. If it is left split (i.e., there exists some such that ), then it must also be right split, and is a direct product decomposition of G. In general, the existence of a right split does not imply the existence of a left split; but in an abelian category (such as that of abelian groups), left splits and right splits are equivalent by the splitting lemma, and a right split is sufficient to produce a direct sum decomposition. In an abelian category, all monomorphisms are also normal, and the diagram may be extended by a second short exact sequence. In the second isomorphism theorem, the product SN is the join of S and N in the lattice of subgroups of G, while the intersection S ∩ N is the meet. The third isomorphism theorem is generalized by the nine lemma to abelian categories and more general maps between objects.

Note on numbers and names

Below we present four theorems, labelled A, B, C and D. They are often numbered as "First isomorphism theorem", "Second..." and so on; however, there is no universal agreement on the numbering. Here we give some examples of the group isomorphism theorems in the literature. Notice that these theorems have analogs for rings and modules. It is less common to include the Theorem D, usually known as the lattice theorem or the correspondence theorem, as one of isomorphism theorems, but when included, it is the last one.

Rings

The statements of the theorems for rings are similar, with the notion of a normal subgroup replaced by the notion of an ideal.

Theorem A (rings)

Let R and S be rings, and let be a ring homomorphism. Then: In particular, if \varphi is surjective then S is isomorphic to.

Theorem B (rings)

Let R be a ring. Let S be a subring of R, and let I be an ideal of R. Then:

Theorem C (rings)

Let R be a ring, and I an ideal of R. Then

Theorem D (rings)

Let I be an ideal of R. The correspondence is an inclusion-preserving bijection between the set of subrings A of R that contain I and the set of subrings of R/I. Furthermore, A (a subring containing I) is an ideal of R if and only if A/I is an ideal of R/I.

Modules

The statements of the isomorphism theorems for modules are particularly simple, since it is possible to form a quotient module from any submodule. The isomorphism theorems for vector spaces (modules over a field) and abelian groups (modules over \mathbb{Z}) are special cases of these. For finite-dimensional vector spaces, all of these theorems follow from the rank–nullity theorem. In the following, "module" will mean "R-module" for some fixed ring R.

Theorem A (modules)

Let M and N be modules, and let φ : M → N be a module homomorphism. Then: In particular, if φ is surjective then N is isomorphic to M / ker(φ).

Theorem B (modules)

Let M be a module, and let S and T be submodules of M. Then:

Theorem C (modules)

Let M be a module, T a submodule of M.

Theorem D (modules)

Let M be a module, N a submodule of M. There is a bijection between the submodules of M that contain N and the submodules of M/N. The correspondence is given by for all. This correspondence commutes with the processes of taking sums and intersections (i.e., is a lattice isomorphism between the lattice of submodules of M/N and the lattice of submodules of M that contain N).

Universal algebra

To generalise this to universal algebra, normal subgroups need to be replaced by congruence relations. A congruence on an algebra A is an equivalence relation that forms a subalgebra of A \times A considered as an algebra with componentwise operations. One can make the set of equivalence classes A/\Phi into an algebra of the same type by defining the operations via representatives; this will be well-defined since \Phi is a subalgebra of A \times A. The resulting structure is the quotient algebra.

Theorem A (universal algebra)

Let be an algebra homomorphism. Then the image of f is a subalgebra of B, the relation given by (i.e. the kernel of f) is a congruence on A, and the algebras A/\Phi and are isomorphic. (Note that in the case of a group, f(x)=f(y) iff, so one recovers the notion of kernel used in group theory in this case.)

Theorem B (universal algebra)

Given an algebra A, a subalgebra B of A, and a congruence \Phi on A, let be the trace of \Phi in B and the collection of equivalence classes that intersect B. Then

Theorem C (universal algebra)

Let A be an algebra and \Phi, \Psi two congruence relations on A such that. Then is a congruence on A/\Psi, and A/\Phi is isomorphic to

Theorem D (universal algebra)

Let A be an algebra and denote the set of all congruences on A. The set is a complete lattice ordered by inclusion. If is a congruence and we denote by the set of all congruences that contain \Phi (i.e. is a principal filter in, moreover it is a sublattice), then the map is a lattice isomorphism.