Contents
International Organization for Migration
The International Organization for Migration (IOM) is a United Nations related organization working in the field of migration. The organization implements operational assistance programmes for migrants, including internally displaced persons, refugees, and migrant workers. The International Organization for Migration is based in Geneva. Its director general is Amy E. Pope.
History
Historical context and predecessor organizations (1951 to 1989)
The International Organization for Migration (IOM) was founded in 1951 in response to the large number of internally displaced persons and war refugees in Europe after the Second World War. The IOM was initially a logistics agency that organized the transport of nearly one million migrants in the 1950s and has undergone several name changes since its inception. The transition from the Provisional Intergovernmental Committee for the Movement of Migrants from Europe (PICMME) in 1951 to the Intergovernmental Committee for European Migration (ICEM) in 1952, to the Intergovernmental Committee for Migration (ICM) in 1980, and finally to the International Organization for Migration (IOM) in 1989 reflects the evolution of the IOM's mandate over its existence, becoming the leading intergovernmental organization in the field of migration.
Integration into the United Nations and the present (1990 to date)
In 1992, it was granted observer status at the United Nations General Assembly (GA resolution A/RES/47/4). In September 2016, the United Nations (UN) Member States, through the General Assembly, unanimously adopted a resolution approving the agreement to transform IOM into an affiliated organization of the UN. This agreement has strengthened the relationship between IOM and the UN and improved its ability to fulfill its respective mandates in the interests of migrants and Member States. The IOM supported the creation of the Global Compact for Migration, the first-ever intergovernmental agreement on international migration which was adopted in Marrakech, Morocco, in December 2018. To support the implementation, follow-up and review of the Global Compact on Migration, the UN Secretary-General Antรณnio Guterres established the UN Network on Migration in 2019. IOM coordinates the United Nations Network on Migration which includes UNHCR, WFP and UNDP, among others. While the IOM's history tracks the man-made and natural disasters of the past half century, including Kosovo and Timor 1999, and the Asian tsunami, the 2003 invasion of Iraq, the Pakistan earthquake of 2004/2005, the 2010 Haiti earthquake, and the European migrant crisisโits credo that humane and orderly migration benefits migrants and society has steadily gained more international acceptance.
Structure
Organization
The organization is headquartered in Geneva, with liaison offices in New York City and Addis Ababa. The Global Migration Data Analysis Centre (GMDAC) is based in Berlin. In 2020, the organization reported that it had over 15,311 employees, with 168 nationalities represented. The highest decision-making body of the IOM is the council, in which all member states are represented. It has rules of procedure and meets at regular intervals to adopt the annual budget and determine the organization's programmatic objectives. The official languages are English, French and Spanish. According to its own figures, the organization's budget in 2020 was around two billion US dollars. This is made up of voluntary contributions from the member states and donations.
Director General
The Director General of the organization is elected by the delegates of the IOM member states for a five-year term. The following table lists the previous directors of the IOM and its predecessor organization, the ICEM. The current Director General is Amy Pope from the United States of America, with Ugochi Daniels from Nigeria serving as Deputy Directors General.
Mandate
The organization's global mandate includes assistance to migrants, including migrant workers, refugees and internally displaced persons. This broad mandate of the organization has earned it praise for flexibility in crisis situations, but also criticism for legal accountability in protection issues. Due to complementary mandates, IOM often cooperates with the UNHCR. For example IOM coordinates work in response to the situation in Venezuela through the Office of International Organization for Migration Director General's Special Envoy for the Regional Response to the Venezuela Situation working with UNHCR and 17 countries in South and Central America and the Caribbean. According to the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA), IOM is one of the central actors in humanitarian aid within the UN system, especially in the context of displacement. IOM's main aid measures include shelter, protection, the provision of basic medical and sanitary care, life safety, coordination, telecommunications and logistics. On the instructions of the UN Emergency Relief Coordinator, IOM, together with UNHCR, is primarily responsible for camp coordination and management in humanitarian emergencies. The organization is also active in stabilization, peacebuilding and development in the context of migration.
Member states
[[File:IOM members and observers.svg|thumb|350px|Member states of the IOM: As of 2023, the International Organization for Migration has 175 member states and 8 observer states. Member states:โข ๐ฆ๐ซ Afghanistan โข ๐ฆ๐ฑ Albania โข ๐ฉ๐ฟ Algeria โข ๐ฆ๐ด Angola โข ๐ฆ๐ฌ Antigua and Barbuda โข ๐ฆ๐ท Argentina โข ๐ฆ๐ฒ Armenia โข ๐ฆ๐บ Australia โข ๐ฆ๐น Austria โข ๐ฆ๐ฟ Azerbaijan โข ๐ง๐ธ Bahamas โข ๐ง๐ฉ Bangladesh โข ๐ง๐ง Barbados โข ๐ง๐พ Belarus โข ๐ง๐ช Belgium โข ๐ง๐ฟ Belize โข ๐ง๐ฏ Benin โข ๐ง๐ด Bolivia โข ๐ง๐ฆ Bosnia and Herzegovina โข ๐ง๐ผ Botswana โข ๐ง๐ท Brazil โข ๐ง๐ฌ Bulgaria โข ๐ง๐ซ Burkina Faso โข ๐ง๐ฎ Burundi โข Cabo Verde โข ๐ฐ๐ญ Cambodia โข ๐จ๐ฒ Cameroon โข ๐จ๐ฆ Canada โข ๐จ๐ซ Central African Republic โข ๐น๐ฉ Chad โข ๐จ๐ฑ Chile โข ๐จ๐ณ China โข ๐จ๐ด Colombia โข ๐ฐ๐ฒ Comoros โข ๐จ๐ฉ Congo โข ๐จ๐ฐ Cook Islands โข ๐จ๐ท Costa Rica โข ๐จ๐ฎ Cรดte d'Ivoire โข ๐ญ๐ท Croatia โข ๐จ๐บ Cuba โข ๐จ๐พ Cyprus โข ๐จ๐ฟ Czech Republic โข Democratic Republic of the Congo โข ๐ฉ๐ฐ Denmark โข ๐ฉ๐ฏ Djibouti โข ๐ฉ๐ฒ Dominica โข ๐ฉ๐ด Dominican Republic โข ๐ช๐จ Ecuador โข ๐ช๐ฌ Egypt โข ๐ธ๐ป El Salvador โข ๐ช๐ท Eritrea โข ๐ช๐ช Estonia โข Eswatini โข ๐ช๐น Ethiopia โข ๐ซ๐ฏ Fiji โข ๐ซ๐ฎ Finland โข ๐ซ๐ท France โข ๐ฌ๐ฆ Gabon โข ๐ฌ๐ฒ Gambia โข Georgia โข ๐ฉ๐ช Germany โข ๐ฌ๐ญ Ghana โข ๐ฌ๐ท Greece โข ๐ฌ๐ฉ Grenada โข ๐ฌ๐น Guatemala โข ๐ฌ๐ณ Guinea โข ๐ฌ๐ผ Guinea-Bissau โข ๐ฌ๐พ Guyana โข ๐ญ๐น Haiti โข Holy See โข ๐ญ๐ณ Honduras โข ๐ญ๐บ Hungary โข ๐ฎ๐ธ Iceland โข ๐ฎ๐ณ India โข ๐ฎ๐ท Iran โข ๐ฎ๐ช Ireland โข ๐ฎ๐ฑ Israel โข ๐ฎ๐น Italy โข ๐ฏ๐ฒ Jamaica โข ๐ฏ๐ต Japan โข ๐ฏ๐ด Jordan โข ๐ฐ๐ฟ Kazakhstan โข ๐ฐ๐ช Kenya โข ๐ฐ๐ฎ Kiribati โข ๐ฐ๐ฌ Kyrgyzstan โข ๐ฑ๐ฆ Lao People's Democratic Republic โข ๐ฑ๐ป Latvia โข ๐ฑ๐ธ Lesotho โข ๐ฑ๐ท Liberia โข ๐ฑ๐พ Libya โข ๐ฑ๐น Lithuania โข ๐ฑ๐บ Luxembourg โข ๐ฒ๐ฌ Madagascar โข ๐ฒ๐ผ Malawi โข ๐ฒ๐ป Maldives โข ๐ฒ๐ฑ Mali โข ๐ฒ๐น Malta โข ๐ฒ๐ญ Marshall Islands โข ๐ฒ๐ท Mauritania โข ๐ฒ๐บ Mauritius โข ๐ฒ๐ฝ Mexico โข ๐ซ๐ฒ Micronesia โข ๐ฒ๐ณ Mongolia โข ๐ฒ๐ช Montenegro โข ๐ฒ๐ฆ Morocco โข ๐ฒ๐ฟ Mozambique โข ๐ฒ๐ฒ Myanmar โข ๐ณ๐ฆ Namibia โข ๐ณ๐ท Nauru โข ๐ณ๐ต Nepal โข ๐ณ๐ฑ Netherlands โข ๐ณ๐ฟ New Zealand โข ๐ณ๐ฎ Nicaragua โข ๐ณ๐ช Niger โข ๐ณ๐ฌ Nigeria โข North Macedonia โข ๐ณ๐ด Norway โข ๐ต๐ฐ Pakistan โข ๐ต๐ผ Palau โข ๐ต๐ฆ Panama โข ๐ต๐ฌ Papua New Guinea โข ๐ต๐พ Paraguay โข ๐ต๐ช Peru โข ๐ต๐ญ Philippines โข ๐ต๐ฑ Poland โข ๐ต๐น Portugal โข Republic of Korea โข Republic of Moldova โข ๐ท๐ด Romania โข Russian Federation โข ๐ท๐ผ Rwanda โข ๐ฐ๐ณ Saint Kitts and Nevis โข ๐ฑ๐จ Saint Lucia โข ๐ป๐จ Saint Vincent and the Grenadines โข ๐ผ๐ธ Samoa โข Sรฃo Tomรฉ and Prรญncipe โข ๐ธ๐ณ Senegal โข ๐ท๐ธ Serbia โข ๐ธ๐จ Seychelles โข ๐ธ๐ฑ Sierra Leone โข ๐ธ๐ฐ Slovakia โข ๐ธ๐ฎ Slovenia โข ๐ธ๐ง Solomon Islands โข ๐ธ๐ด Somalia โข ๐ฟ๐ฆ South Africa โข ๐ธ๐ธ South Sudan โข ๐ช๐ธ Spain โข ๐ฑ๐ฐ Sri Lanka โข ๐ธ๐ฉ Sudan โข ๐ธ๐ท Suriname โข ๐ธ๐ช Sweden โข ๐จ๐ญ Switzerland โข ๐น๐ฏ Tajikistan โข ๐น๐ญ Thailand โข Timor-Leste โข ๐น๐ฌ Togo โข ๐น๐ด Tonga โข ๐น๐น Trinidad and Tobago โข ๐น๐ณ Tunisia โข ๐น๐ท Turkey โข ๐น๐ฒ Turkmenistan โข ๐น๐ป Tuvalu โข ๐บ๐ฌ Uganda โข ๐บ๐ฆ Ukraine โข ๐ฌ๐ง United Kingdom โข United Republic of Tanzania โข ๐บ๐ธ United States โข ๐บ๐พ Uruguay โข ๐บ๐ฟ Uzbekistan โข ๐ป๐บ Vanuatu โข ๐ป๐ช Venezuela โข ๐ป๐ณ Viet Nam โข ๐พ๐ช Yemen โข ๐ฟ๐ฒ Zambia โข ๐ฟ๐ผ Zimbabwe Observer States: โข ๐ง๐ญ Bahrain โข ๐ง๐น Bhutan โข ๐ฎ๐ฉ Indonesia โข ๐ฐ๐ผ Kuwait โข ๐ฒ๐พ Malaysia โข ๐ถ๐ฆ Qatar โข ๐ธ๐ฒ San Marino โข ๐ธ๐ฆ Saudi Arabia Non-Member States: โข Brunei โข ๐ฌ๐ถ Equatorial Guinea โข ๐ญ๐ฐ Hong Kong โข ๐ฎ๐ถ Iraq โข ๐ฑ๐ง Lebanon โข Macau โข ๐ด๐ฒ Oman โข ๐ธ๐ฌ Singapore โข Syria โข ๐น๐ผ Taiwan โข ๐ฆ๐ช United Arab Emirates
Criticism
2003 Amnesty and Human Rights Watch
In 2003, both Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch were critical of the IOM's role in the Australian government's "Pacific Solution" of transferring asylum seekers to offshore detention centres. Human Rights Watch criticized the IOM for operating Manus Regional Processing Centre and the processing centre on Nauru despite not having a refugee protection mandate. Human Rights Watch criticized the IOM for being part of "arbitrary detention" and for denying asylum seekers access to legal advice. Human Rights Watch urged the IOM to cease operation the process centres, which it stated were "detention centres" and to hand management of the centres to the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. Amnesty International expressed concern that the IOM undertook actions on behalf of governments that negatively impacted the human rights of asylum seekers, refugees and migrants. Amnesty International cited an example of fourteen Kurds in Indonesia who were expelled from Australian waters by Australian authorities and relocated to Indonesia. Amnesty International requested an assurance that the IOM will abide by the principle of non-refoulement.
2022 Refugee Council of Australia
In 2022, the role that the IOM played in housing refugees in Indonesia was described by the Refugee Council of Australia as presenting a "humanitarian veneer while carrying out rights-violating activities on behalf of Western nationsโ by researchers Asher Hirsch and Cameron Doig in The Globe and Mail. The community housing that the IOM operated, using Australian government funding, was described by the Refugee Council of Australia "inhumane conditions, solitary confinement, lack of basic essentials and medical care, physical and sexual abuse, and severe overcrowding". Rohingya John Joniad described the housing as an "open prison".
This article is derived from Wikipedia and licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0. View the original article.
Wikipediaยฎ is a registered trademark of the
Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.
Bliptext is not
affiliated with or endorsed by Wikipedia or the
Wikimedia Foundation.