In arithmetic, a complex-base system is a positional numeral system whose radix is an imaginary (proposed by Donald Knuth in 1955 ) or complex number (proposed by S. Khmelnik in 1964 and Walter F. Penney in 1965 ).

In general

Let D be an integral domain \subset \C, and |\cdot| the (Archimedean) absolute value on it. A number X\in D in a positional number system is represented as an expansion where The cardinality R:=|Z| is called the level of decomposition. A positional number system or coding system is a pair with radix \rho and set of digits Z, and we write the standard set of digits with R digits as Desirable are coding systems with the features:

In the real numbers

In this notation our standard decimal coding scheme is denoted by the standard binary system is the negabinary system is and the balanced ternary system is All these coding systems have the mentioned features for \Z and \R, and the last two do not require a sign.

In the complex numbers

Well-known positional number systems for the complex numbers include the following (\mathrm i being the imaginary unit):

Binary systems

Binary coding systems of complex numbers, i.e. systems with the digits Z_2={0,1}, are of practical interest. Listed below are some coding systems (all are special cases of the systems above) and resp. codes for the (decimal) numbers −1, 2, −2, i . The standard binary (which requires a sign, first line) and the "negabinary" systems (second line) are also listed for comparison. They do not have a genuine expansion for i . As in all positional number systems with an Archimedean absolute value, there are some numbers with multiple representations. Examples of such numbers are shown in the right column of the table. All of them are repeating fractions with the repetend marked by a horizontal line above it. If the set of digits is minimal, the set of such numbers has a measure of 0. This is the case with all the mentioned coding systems. The almost binary quater-imaginary system is listed in the bottom line for comparison purposes. There, real and imaginary part interleave each other.

Base

−1 ± i [[Image:ComplexTwindragon.svg|thumb|right|290px|The complex numbers with integer part all zeroes in the base i – 1 system]] Of particular interest are the quater-imaginary base (base 2i ) and the base −1 ± i systems discussed below, both of which can be used to finitely represent the Gaussian integers without sign. Base −1 ± i , using digits 0 and 1 , was proposed by S. Khmelnik in 1964 and Walter F. Penney in 1965.

Connection to the twindragon

The rounding region of an integer – i.e., a set S of complex (non-integer) numbers that share the integer part of their representation in this system – has in the complex plane a fractal shape: the twindragon (see figure). This set S is, by definition, all points that can be written as with x_k\in Z_2. S can be decomposed into 16 pieces congruent to \tfrac14 S. Notice that if S is rotated counterclockwise by 135°, we obtain two adjacent sets congruent to, because. The rectangle R\subset S in the center intersects the coordinate axes counterclockwise at the following points:, , and , and. Thus, S contains all complex numbers with absolute value ≤ 1⁄15. As a consequence, there is an injection of the complex rectangle into the interval [0,1) of real numbers by mapping with b > 2. Furthermore, there are the two mappings and both surjective, which give rise to a surjective (thus space-filling) mapping which, however, is not continuous and thus not a space-filling curve. But a very close relative, the Davis-Knuth dragon, is continuous and a space-filling curve.